April 29, 2010

Gates Rethinks His War on Polio

Bill Gates walked into the World Health Organization's headquarters in Geneva—for a meeting in an underground chamber where global pandemics are managed—and was greeted by bad news.  Polio was spreading across Africa, even after he gave $700 million to try to wipe out the disease.  That outbreak raged last summer, and this week a new outbreak hit Tajikistan, which hadn't seen polio for 19 years. The spread threatens one of the most ambitious health campaigns in the world, the effort to destroy the crippling disease once and for all. It also marks a setback for the Microsoft Corp. co-founder's new career as full-time philanthropist.

Next week, the organizations behind the polio fight, including WHO, Unicef, Rotary International and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, plan to announce a major revamp of their strategy to address shortcomings exposed by the outbreaks.

Polio is a centerpiece of Mr. Gates's charitable giving. Last year the billionaire traveled to Africa, one of the main battlegrounds against the disease, to confer with doctors, aid workers and a sultan to propel the polio-eradication effort.

"There's no way to sugarcoat the last 12 months," Bruce Aylward, a WHO official, told Mr. Gates in the meeting in the underground pandemic center last June. He described how the virus was rippling through countries believed to have stopped the disease.

Mr. Gates asked: "So, what do we do next?"

That question goes to the heart of one of the most controversial debates in global health: Is humanity better served by waging wars on individual diseases, like polio? Or is it better to pursue a broader set of health goals simultaneously—improving hygiene, expanding immunizations, providing clean drinking water—that don't eliminate any one disease, but might improve the overall health of people in developing countries?

The new plan integrates both approaches. It's an acknowledgment, bred by last summer's outbreak, that disease-specific wars can succeed only if they also strengthen the overall health system in poor countries.

If successful, the recalibrated campaign could shape global health strategy for decades and boost fights against other diseases. A failure could rank the effort as one of the most expensive miscalculations in mankind's long war with disease. Already, polio has evaded a two-decadelong, $8.2 billion effort to kill it off.

Big donors have long preferred fighting individual diseases, known as a "vertical" strategy.  The goal is to repeat 1979's victory over smallpox, the only disease ever to be eradicated. By contrast, the broader, "horizontal" strategy has less well-defined goals and might not move the needle of global health statistics for years.

The polio fight is a lesson for Mr. Gates's foundation, which is funding other vaccines that could face similar setbacks. In the polio fight, his foundation backed a program that was following an outdated playbook. Polio's resurgence last year forced a major rewrite.

The shift on polio was informed by Mr. Gates's trip last year to Nigeria, a nation with a history of exporting the virus to other countries. Mr. Gates was accompanied by a Wall Street Journal reporter.

Mr. Gates has forged himself as a global-health diplomat following his 2008 retirement from Microsoft. He is using his star power and $34 billion philanthropy to try to push businesses, health groups and governments to improve health in developing countries. 

In the Nigerian city of Sokoto, the dusty center of a once vast Islamic empire, Mr. Gates drove to a palace, walked past a row of trumpeters and found himself looking up at a man on a throne wearing a flowing robe and turban—the Sultan of Sokoto, spiritual leader of Nigeria's 70 million Muslims.

Just as Mr. Gates introduced himself to the sultan, the lights flickered out.

"I want to welcome you to the real world—to the real third world," the sultan said to Mr. Gates from his gilded chair in the darkened room. 

Men like the sultan are important allies. In 2003, Islamic leaders in northern Nigeria spread rumors that polio vaccines sterilized Muslim girls. Leaders halted vaccinations, allowing the virus to spread. The WHO said the virus eventually infected 20 countries.  By the start of last year, Nigeria was home to half of the world's 1,600 polio cases. The sultan could help get the campaign back on track.

Speaking to Mr. Gates and a room of religious leaders, the sultan declared his support for the polio fight. "We want to show you our commitment," he said. "The time you have taken to come here will not be in vain."

But he, too, questioned the wisdom of targeting one disease. "Other health issues should be looked into," the sultan said, "instead of just facing one direction with polio eradication." He ticked off tuberculosis, HIV and AIDS, malaria, cholera and a parasitic infection known as "snail fever."

After the global victory over smallpox 30 years ago, a rush of energy went into similar "vertical" attacks on single diseases. The polio program followed that approach and made great gains. Led by WHO and donors such as Rotary, the campaigns by the year 2000 slashed the world's polio cases to under 1,000 from 350,000 in 1988. Polio fighters planned to eradicate the disease by 2000.

That date came and went. But polio persisted, eating up billions of dollars. 

Critics argued for a shift away from killing polio to free up money for controlling multiple diseases. In some countries, polio campaigns became an example of a functioning vaccination system even as other diseases were missed. Mr. Gates saw that himself in Nigeria.

Arriving at a Sokoto health clinic in a Toyota minivan stocked with Diet Coke, Mr. Gates stepped inside and was soon leaning on a wooden desk, flipping through children's vaccine records. "Do you know if this child had the first dose of DPT?" he asked, pointing to a record of a diphtheria vaccination of a boy who appeared to have missed a treatment. A health worker beside him didn't have an answer.

The clinic also had no hepatitis B and yellow fever vaccines, the workers said, because the government's system for supplying medicine wasn't working.

By contrast, in front of the clinic, a polio campaign was in full swing. Health workers tended coolers filled with vials of vaccine for children gathered there. 

At a meeting the next day in the capital, Abuja, Nigeria's head of primary health care, Dr. Muhammad Ali Pate, reopened the vertical-vs.-horizontal debate. Even if Nigeria lowers polio cases, he said, the gains "can't hold" without a broader health-care system, he said.

Mr. Gates listened, seated behind a name tag that read "Our Guest." Dr. Pate showed a slide of a cartoon steam-engine train with cars labeled "Education" and "Disease Control." Polio should be just one car in that train, he said.

Mr. Gates didn't disagree—certainly Nigeria needs a functioning health system, he said in interviews. But it was a matter of priorities, he said. With the world so close to killing polio, countries like Nigeria should make eradication a top priority, he said. Victory would free up millions of dollars to pay for broader health improvements.

"So the benefit of finishing is huge," he said.

On the plane, Mr. Gates strategized about what else would help win the fight, balking at one religious leader's suggestion: forced vaccinations. "Strap 'em, down, I say! Let's make it illegal" to not take the vaccine, Mr. Gates joked. Then he got serious again, citing failed attempts in the U.S. to enforce compulsory vaccinations.

In many respects, Mr. Gates remains a tech geek at heart. Aboard his plane, he expounded on an array of scientific topics: From developments in genotyping, to research showing that Bangladesh's high disease-immunity rates are due to "oral-fecal" transmission (when people build immunity by ingesting contaminated food or water).

In Nigeria, Mr. Gates scored a diplomatic triumph. He won commitments from the sultan, and Nigeria's governors, to take a more active role in polio vaccinations. "We really stand at the threshold of global health success on polio," he told the assembled governors at the close of the trip.

However, just three days later, a new front opened 2,000 miles away in Uganda. There, a woman walked into a hospital to say her son couldn't move his left leg. It was Uganda's first polio case in 12 years.  Cases also popped up in Mali, Togo and Ghana and Cote d'Ivore, which hadn't reported polio for four years. A girl in Kenya became that country's first polio case since 2006.

Polio, which spreads through water contaminated by human feces, paralyzes just one person for every 200 infected. Discovering just a few cases could mean that thousands have been infected. 

That demands massive vaccination campaigns.

On Feb. 28, 2009, Mr. Aylward, the WHO official, was grocery shopping in Geneva with his wife and son when he got an urgent email about the Uganda case. For 30 minutes, Mr. Aylward stood next to a spinach display, working his phone and setting in motion a plan that 10 days later vaccinated 48,000 children in Uganda.

Costly emergency responses like this became increasingly common last year. The Gates foundation had set $47 million aside for emergencies, Mr. Aylward said. By early June, the money was running down.  That month, Mr. Gates flew to Geneva for the meeting in the WHO's underground room.  Mr. Aylward came with good news to offset the bad news about polio's resurgence, he recalled later.

After describing the outbreaks, he shifted to Nigeria's progress against polio and described positive results from a trial of a new vaccine. 

But those positives didn't offset the risks of polio's revival, say several attendees of a follow-up meeting. "It was becoming evident that the virus almost knew no bounds," said Dr. Steve Cochi, senior adviser at Centers for Disease Control. "It kind of confirmed some of our worst fears."

A month later in Seattle, Gates Foundation officials paused at a PowerPoint presentation showing the foundation's polio grants were approaching $1 billion. It was a staggering amount for a program that appeared to be stalling. "We can't go to Tachi and Bill and ask for more money," without reviewing the program, one person said, referring to Mr. Gates and Tachi Yamada, a top foundation official, according to an attendee.

In August, experts commissioned by the WHO landed in Angola, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India and Nigeria to evaluate the polio program. In Africa, a team found that once polio had been ended in some countries, weak health-care systems let it return. In northern India, bad sanitation, malnutrition and other intestinal issues are believed to hurt the oral polio vaccine's effectiveness.

These findings echoed the message to Mr. Gates in Nigeria, and marked a turning point among the Gates Foundation and other backers of the polio fight in the debate over whether the strictly "vertical" polio strategy could succeed.

In October, the Gates Foundation summoned backers of the program, including Unicef, CDC and Rotary, to its Seattle headquarters for a major rethink. Two weeks later it called in independent experts for help. The outcome of those meetings will be reflected in the revamped plan coming next week. Polio backers say they are buoyed by reports of just 71 polio cases worldwide this year, vs. 328 in the year-earlier period. 

If approved in May by member nations of the WHO, the new strategy will set ambitious goals for getting close to eradicating polio by the end of 2012. The plan bolsters the core "vertical" approach of polio program but also adds a "horizontal" strategy, including training for health workers on topics such as hygiene and sanitation.

Nigeria will be a key testing ground. The country has made strong progress against the disease since Mr. Gates's visit. But stopping polio there, and in at least one of the three other countries where it's deeply rooted, will be the main challenge in the next three years, Mr. Aylward says.

Failure to achieve that goal will raise questions over whether the program continues, he says.

A big hurdle is money. The polio program is $1.4 billion short of the $2.6 billion it needs over next three years. The Gates Foundation will continue its polio grants, but says it can't make up the shortfall.

But funding is just one worry for Mr. Gates in his new career. He built his foundation on the promise of life-saving vaccines, reflecting his penchant toward finding technological solutions to problems. As polio shows, technology can be hampered by political, religious and societal obstacles in the countries where he's spending his money. He's still learning how to navigate through those forces.

In Nigeria last year, Mr. Gates sat on the lawn behind his hotel reflecting on that. Science can simplify the job, he said, but "the human piece is the ultimate test." 

By:  Robert A. Guth, The Wall Street Journal
Reviewed / Posted by: Scott W. Yates, MD, MBA, MS, FACP

April 27, 2010

Sick Days

"This is my ninth sick day this semester. It's pretty tough coming up with new illnesses... so I better make this one count."

-- Matthew Broderick as Ferris Bueller, Ferris Bueller's Day Off

April 24, 2010

Electronic prescriptions reduce errors sevenfold

Clinicians using an electronic system to write prescriptions were seven times less likely to make errors than those writing prescriptions by hand.

To evaluate the effects of e-prescribing on medication safety, researchers looked at prescriptions written by clinicians at 12 community practices in the Hudson Valley region of New York. The authors compared the number and severity of prescription errors between 15 clinicians who adopted e-prescribing and 15 who continued to write prescriptions by hand. The study was published online Feb. 26 by the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Researchers conducted a prospective, non-randomized study using pre-post design of 15 clinicians who adopted e-prescribing with concurrent controls of 15 paper-based clinicians from September 2005 through June 2007. Authors reviewed 3,684 paper-based prescriptions at the start of the study and 3,848 paper-based and electronic prescriptions at one year of follow-up.

For e-prescribing adopters, error rates decreased nearly sevenfold, from 42.5 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 36.7 to 49.3) at baseline to 6.6 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 5.1 to 8.3) one year after adoption (P<;0.001). For non-adopters, error rates remained at 37.3 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 27.6 to 50.2) at baseline and 38.4 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 27.4 to 53.9) at one year (P=0.54). Examples included incomplete directions and prescribing a medication but omitting the quantity. A small number of errors were more serious, such as prescribing incorrect dosages. Although most errors would not seriously harm patients, they'd likely result in callbacks and lost time.

E-prescribing completely eliminated illegibility errors (87.6 per 100 prescriptions at baseline for e-prescribing adopters, 0 at one year).

All the practices that adopted e-prescribing received technical assistance from a health information technology service provider. The study noted that, without extensive technical support, it is difficult for practices to implement e-prescribing.

Reviewed / Posted by: Scott W. Yates, MD, MBA, MS, FACP

April 21, 2010

Beep! It's Your Medicine Nagging You

Much of the medicine prescribed to treat chronic conditions like high blood pressure and diabetes doesn't work-because patients neglect to take it.

But what if someone, or something, called to remind them every time they were due for a dose?

Express Scripts Inc., the big St. Louis pharmacy-benefit manager, is about to test an electronic pill container that issues a series of increasingly insistent reminders, in a national study among patient members.

The container-actually a high-tech top for a standard pill bottle called a "GlowCap"-is equipped with a wireless transmitter that plugs into the wall. When it is time for a dose of medicine, the GlowCap emits a pulsing orange light; after an hour, the gadget starts beeping every five minutes, in arpeggios that become more complicated and insistent. After that, the device can set off an automated telephone or text message reminder to patients who fail to take their pills. It also can generate email or letters reporting to a family member or doctor how often the medication is taken.

It is one of the high-tech ways companies are grappling with medicine noncompliance. Only about half of patients who are prescribed a medication for a chronic condition are still taking the drug regularly after a year, says Daniel Touchette, assistant professor of pharmacy practice at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Patients have lots of reasons for not taking their medicine. Some experience unpleasant side effects. Others believe the drug doesn't work. They can't afford the cost of taking it every day. Or they simply forget.

Novartis AG has licensed rights to a minuscule edible chip, from Proteus Biomedical Inc., which attaches to a pharmaceutical; when it hits the patient's stomach, the chip sends a signal to the patient and designated individuals. Another system, from Leap of Faith Technologies Inc., issues automated phone reminders to patients, who can scan bar codes or electronic chips on their drug labels to confirm they're taking the right medications. Various applications for the Apple iPhone also offer prompts to take medicine.

An Express Scripts rival, Medco Health Solutions Inc., is tackling noncompliance with efforts including pharmacists, who use in-depth databases to detect when patients aren't refilling prescriptions regularly and call to offer information. Increasingly, insurers and employers are cutting or eliminating drug co-pays for patients with chronic conditions; the thinking is that patients will take medications more often if they don't have to pay as much for them.

Minding Your Medicine

Listen to a telephone prescription reminder from Vitality Inc.'s GlowCap pill bottle, which is being tested by Express Scripts.

The most effective programs combine education and reminders, says Daniel Touchette, assistant professor of pharmacy practice at the University of Illinois at Chicago. But even they improve the share of patients adhering to drug regimens by no more than about 10%.

In about a month, Express Scripts will start a small test of the GlowCap, made by Vitality Inc., a Cambridge, Mass., maker of high-tech health packaging. Express plans a larger trial focused on drugs for cholesterol, diabetes, high blood pressure and heart failure this summer.

Bob Nease, Express Scripts' chief scientist, says the goal is to see if the gadget improves pill-taking, and also to use detailed information that the device beams wirelessly to learn more about how and why patients take-or fail to take-medication. "It is an outstanding instrument" for tracking such information, he says.

Patients using the GlowCap get reminder calls only if they opt to do so. They can opt out of having doctors and family members receive email updates. One issue the study will address is whether the device raises patients' privacy concerns, Dr. Nease says. Dr. Nease declined to comment on the study's cost or size. Participants won't have to pay for the devices, which sell online for around $100.

Some patients won't welcome the idea of having their daily medication monitored. Vera Karger, a retired Monroe, Conn., speech pathologist, says she wouldn't mind the lights and noises, but emails to her doctor or family would "make me feel inept, or like I was being regarded as a child." And her low-tech seven-day pill boxes , one for her two morning medications and one for the two she takes in the evenings,work fine, she says.

Richard Rowe, a Belmont, Mass., acquaintance of a Vitality executive, tried the gadget and says the report to his doctor "significantly increased my motivation" to take his cholesterol-lowering statin drug. "I didn't want to be embarrassed in front of my physician," says Mr. Rowe, chief executive of an educational nonprofit. Still, the bottle's beeping was "a little annoying," he noted.

From Anna Wilde Mathews, Wall Street Journal
Reviewed / Posted by: Scott W. Yates, MD, MBA, MS, FACP

April 20, 2010

Conception

"We want the facts to fit the preconceptions. When they don't, it's easier to ignore the facts than to change the preconceptions."

-- Jessamyn West (1902 - 1984)

April 18, 2010

Fraud in Medical Research Report: Autism bowel disease once linked to shots may not exist



LONDON (AP) — A new autism disease identified in a flawed paper linking a common children's vaccine to autism may not exist, new research says.

A dozen years ago, British surgeon Andrew Wakefield and colleagues published a study in the journal Lancet on a new bowel disease and proposed a connection between autism and the vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella.

The study was widely discredited, 10 of Wakefield's co-authors renounced its conclusions and the Lancet retracted the paper in February. The research set off a health scare, and vaccination rates in Britain dropped so low measles outbreaks returned.

In research published Friday in the medical journal BMJ, reporter Brian Deer examines whether the illness described by Wakefield and colleagues — autistic enterocolitis, a bowel disease found in autistic people — actually exists.

In 1996, Wakefield was hired by a lawyer to find a new syndrome of bowel and brain disease to help launch a lawsuit against drug companies that made the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, according to BMJ article.

According to reports from London's Royal Free Hospital, eight of the 11 children included in Wakefield's original study had normal bowels. But in the Lancet study, 11 of the 12 were said to have a swollen bowel, which was said to be proof of a new gastrointestinal disease affecting autistic children.

In 2005, Wakefield started a clinic in Texas to research and treat the syndrome.

The original biopsy slides from the children in the Lancet study are no longer available. Deer asked independent experts to examine hospital reports on the biopsies, who failed to find any distinctive inflammation that would qualify as a new disease.

In an accompanying editorial, Sir Nicholas Wright from the Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry said "any firm conclusion would be inadvisable." He said several studies have shown a link between inflamed bowels and autism, but too little evidence exists to prove there is a new illness.

In January, Britain's General Medical Council ruled Wakefield had acted unethically. He and the two colleagues who have not renounced the study face being stripped of their right to practice medicine in Britain.

Reviewed / Posted by: Scott W Yates, MD, MBA, MS, FACP

April 17, 2010

Three New Drugs to Combat Obesity

Regulators to Review New Drugs to Curb Appetite

A new generation of anti-obesity drugs could hit the market in coming months, the latest attempt in what has proved a difficult medicine to make safe for patients.

Currently, just two anti-obesity drugs are approved for long-term treatment, and medical practitioners say both can cause undesirable side effects in many patients. The three new medications, which have been submitted for approval to the Food and Drug Administration, also can be expected to have side effects for some patients, particularly because treating obesity with drugs involves altering the body's chemistry. But doctors say different weight-loss medications affect people differently, so having more choices should help them match a patient to a therapy that maximizes weight loss while minimizing side effects.

Obesity has many causes, and ferreting out what is going to work in individuals requires more options," said Charles Billington, a professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota and medical director of the obesity program at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center.

The FDA will need to review data on the drugs, and approval isn't assured. The agency is aware of past problems with anti-obesity drugs and plans to evaluate the new drugs under the assumption that patients likely would use them indefinitely, an FDA spokeswoman said.

The three new drugs awaiting regulatory approval are lorcaserin, manufactured by Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc., Vivus Inc.'s Qnexa, and Orexigen Therapeutics Inc.'s Contrave. The companies are small drug developers and each has held talks to partner with a larger pharmaceutical concern to help sell the products, although no agreements have been signed.

The three drugs work by affecting the patient's central nervous system to dampen appetite, Dr. Billington said. "To say that you are going to do that without any side effects is just not understanding how things work in real life," he said.

Typically, medications help moderately obese patients lose about 5% to 10% of their body weight. While not a large percentage, even that much weight loss can mean a big reduction in diabetes and cardiovascular risk, said Jeanine Albu, chief of the Metabolic Clinic at the New York Obesity Research Center at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital. "The problem is keeping the weight off over time. A lot of people just gradually gain it back," said Dr. Albu.

Lifestyle Changes First

For most obesity patients, a physician's first line of treatment is to modify the person's lifestyle, including through dieting, exercise and counseling. When this isn't successful, some patients might move on to one of the few anti-obesity drugs currently available. And in cases of dangerous obesity, doctors might recommend bariatric surgery, which makes the stomach smaller. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that about two-thirds of U.S. adults are overweight, while a third are considered obese. Obesity is defined as having a body mass index—a measure of weight in relation to height—of 30 or higher.

Some earlier diet drugs have had a mixed history. The so-called fen-phen drug combination manufactured by Wyeth, now owned by Pfizer Inc., was recalled in the 1990s after one of the medication's components was linked to heart-valve damage.

One drug currently in use also has stirred controversy. Meridia, sold by Abbott Laboratories, was pulled from the market in Europe this year after a study indicated that people with certain health problems who took the prescription drug had more heart attacks, strokes and other cardiovascular problems than people getting a placebo. In the U.S., the FDA required Abbott to put a stronger warning on the Meridia label.

Another drug currently on the market, Orlistat, which is sold over the counter as Alli by GlaxoSmithKline Plc and in prescription form as Xenical by Roche Holding AG, can cause undesirable bowel-related problems in some patients. The drugs haven't been blockbusters. Financial firm Cowen and Co. estimates that Alli had U.S. sales of $150 million last year, while Meridia and Xenical had sales of $40 million and $35 million, respectively. Doctors also regularly prescribe phentermine, which is approved for short-term use of, say, a few weeks, to treat obesity.

Arena Pharmaceuticals said its lorcaserin drug works by stimulating a neurotransmitter receptor in the brain that helps control appetite and metabolism. The mechanism is similar to the one used by a component of the recalled fen-phen drug combination, but with an important difference.

While the older medications worked on multiple versions of the body's receptors, including those in the heart, lorcaserin has a very specific target that is mostly in the brain, Arena said. Clinical trials have shown there is no increase in such heart-related side effects with the new drug, it said.

In clinical trials, patients taking lorcaserin lost about 6% of their weight on average, while patients taking a placebo lost between 2% and 3%. The most common side effects of the pill, which would be taken twice a day, were headache and nausea, although both symptoms disappeared after an initial period of use.

Combination Therapies

The two other drugs under FDA review are both combination treatments of compounds that are already on the market, but will be delivered in new dosages and methods. Using two drugs at once can be more effective in treating obesity because the brain has multiple ways of making sure that appetite is preserved, as a survival mechanism. Blocking multiple pathways, therefore, can help ensure that a therapy will work.

Orexigen said its Contrave drug works by stimulating a group of neurons in the brain, known as POMC, which, when activated, seem to result in reduced food intake and increased metabolism. The first drug in the combination, the antidepressant bupropion, turns on POMC. But that action also causes the release of a hormone that subsequently switches POMC back off in order to prevent perpetual weight loss. So the second drug in the combination, addiction-treating naltrexone, blocks that hormone in order to allow weight loss to continue, the company said.

Giving the two together as Contrave, in a sustained-release formulation taken twice a day, led to average weight loss that ranged from 5% to 9.3% of a patient's body weight in four clinical trials. Trial participants who took a placebo lost between 1.2% and 5.1% of their body weight. The medication's most common side effects were nausea, constipation and headache, all of which tended to go away after an initial period.

The third drug, Qnexa from Vivus, was the most effective in clinical trials at taking off pounds. In two separate trials, patients lost an average of 10.4% and 11%, respectively, of their body weight, while those taking a placebo lost 1.8% and 1.6%.

Vivus said Qnexa is a controlled-release formulation that combines low doses of the stimulant phentermine, which leads to the release of the stress hormone norepinephrine to cut the body's appetite, and topiramate, which works in various ways to increase satiety, or the sense of feeling full. Combining the two underlying drugs also seems to counteract some of their individual effects: Topirimate can cause cognitive slowing, which phentermine negates, and topirimate counters the blood-pressure raising of phentermine, the company said.

In clinical trials, the most common side effects of the once-daily Qnexa were constipation and dry mouth, along with mild tingling in the finger tips, all of which eventually went away.

From The Wall Street Journal, by Thomas Gryta
Reviewed / Posted by: Scott W Yates, MD, MBA, MS, FACP

Comments:

Of these three, Qnexa appears to be the most promising in general.  However, topimirate can also cause confusion also and this may limit the use of this combination.

SWY

April 15, 2010

April 14, 2010

Bushmeat Presents Latest Food Scare

An article in today's Wall Street Journal looks pretty scary on the surface...until you read what kinds of meats have been involved.  Unless you're eating Malayan fruit bat, Zanzibar red colobus monkey or a greater cane rat, probably no need for concern.  Here's the complete article for those interested.


Researchers Find Strains of a Virus Related to HIV in Illegal Imports of Primate Flesh, a Delicacy to Some Africans

Researchers testing bushmeat smuggled into the U.S. have found strains of a virus in the same family as HIV, according to preliminary findings to be released Wednesday.  For years, authorities have tried to crack down on the smuggling of meat from certain animals, such as bats, monkeys and rodents, which some people consider a food delicacy.

In 2008, the Wildlife Conservation Society, a nonprofit which runs many of New York City's zoos, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention joined forces to test illegally imported meat entering the New York City area from West Africa for dangerous diseases such as monkey pox, the virus that causes SARS and retroviruses such as HIV.

Preliminary findings will be presented at Rockefeller University in New York on Wednesday.  Scientists found two strains of simian foamy virus, commonly found in nonhuman primates, from three species—two mangabeys and a chimpanzee—in bushmeat.

The virus can infect humans but hasn't been conclusively linked to known diseases. However, the related simian immunodeficiency virus has been found in bushmeat tested outside of the country and is considered responsible for the first cases of HIV by scientists.  Bushmeat, often cured or smoked, has entered the U.S. through the mail and in shipping containers.

Smugglers also resort to packing smoked monkey or cane rat in personal suitcases. A fraction of the bushmeat coming into the New York City area is seized at the border by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and hundreds of samples from at least 14 species have been sent to be studied.

"We get these big boxes of meat," said Kristine Smith, a wildlife veterinarian who is conducting the study for the Wildlife Conservation Society. "Sometimes you see primate heads or hands in there."

Estimates on the size of the bushmeat trade vary wildly. The Fish and Wildlife Service and Custom's and Border Protection keep statistics on illegal meat entering the country but do not break it down into a bushmeat category.

"We don't have any evidence to suggest that the U.S., in terms of volume, is a large market based on our seizures," said Sandra Cleva, spokesperson for Fish and Wildlife Service's law enforcement. "From a health perspective, it's always a concern."

The meat is highly valued in some immigrant communities, notably among West Africans, said Richard Ruggiero, who works on international bushmeat issues for the Fish and Wildlife Service.  It is like "any other illegal commodity," Mr. Ruggiero said. "It's a clandestine industry. They sell it in clandestine networks." He added that many of the smuggled meats are from endangered species.  

"In Africa today, many wildlife populations are being eaten to extinction," Mr. Ruggiero said. "The greatest impact to wildlife populations in Africa is the bushmeat trade."  Rodents and bats are being eaten because many of the larger species have already been killed off. Local markets for meat can sometimes be sustainable but even national markets in African countries can have dire affects on wildlife.  He added, "In former times, people would hunt around their village and consume most of the bushmeat or sell it to neighbors. In today's world, we have transportation in and out of previously impenetrable forests."

Fines for importing bushmeat are low and there have been few prosecutions for selling it. In December, Mamie Manneh, a Liberian immigrant who lives on Staten Island, was sentenced to probation by a New York federal court for smuggling and selling monkey meat  The danger to Americans lies in the possibility of a disease entering through smuggled animals and meat such as a monkey pox outbreak in 2003 that the Center for Disease Control traced to African rodents.

Scientists from the CDC said there are many cases of diseases transmitted through handling meat. Cooking meat kills many food borne pathogens such as salmonella, though some diseases carried by animals are not killed in the cooking process.  

"We do know that looking at products at the airports there is no quality control on bushmeat," said Nina Marano, a scientist at the CDC.  "People will claim it's smoked or it's dried but we have pulled samples out of packages with meat on the bone, juice in the bag, still bloody."

From The Wall Street Journal, by Joel Stonington
Reviewed / Posted by: Scott W Yates, MD, MBA, MS, FACP